105 lines
3.8 KiB
Org Mode
105 lines
3.8 KiB
Org Mode
#+OPTIONS: num:nil
|
|
#+AUTHOR: JLH
|
|
#+AUTHOR: KL
|
|
|
|
* Planning The HoTT Game
|
|
|
|
** Aims of the HoTT Game
|
|
- To get mathematicians with no experience in proof verification interested in HoTT and able to use Agda for HoTT
|
|
- Big-ass-boss: Loop space of S^1 = Z
|
|
- Try to balance hiding cubical implementations whilst exploiting their advantages
|
|
|
|
** Barriers
|
|
- HOLD Installation of emacs
|
|
- TODO Usage of emacs
|
|
- TODO General type theoretic foundations
|
|
- TODO Cubical type theory
|
|
|
|
** Format
|
|
- [?] Everything done in .agda files
|
|
- Partially written code with spaces for participants to fill in + answer files
|
|
- Levels set out with mini-bosses like in Nat Num Game, but with an overall boss
|
|
- [?] Side quests
|
|
- References to Harper lectures and HoTT book
|
|
|
|
** Content
|
|
# listing topics we have pursued, NO ordering
|
|
|
|
- emacs usage
|
|
- agda usage + basic commands (all covered in https://agda.readthedocs.io/en/v2.6.0.1/getting-started/quick-guide.html)
|
|
+ recommend doom emacs + implicit/explicit arguments
|
|
+ holes and inferred types
|
|
+ =_+_= vs =plus__=
|
|
- type theory basics + meta (judgemental/definitional) equality vs internal (propositional) equality
|
|
- function extensionality
|
|
+ type formation
|
|
- inductive types + (side Q) positive and negative constructions of Pi/Sigma types
|
|
+ =data= and =record= + universes
|
|
+ recursors / pattern matching + (side Q) some natural number exercises as early evidence of being able to 'do maths'?
|
|
+ different notions of equivalence
|
|
- fibers contractable
|
|
- quasi-inverse
|
|
- zig-zag + (side Q) types are infinity groupoids
|
|
+ extra paths (univalence, fun ext, HITs)
|
|
- HoTT + basics
|
|
- meta interval, identity type vs path type
|
|
+ mention identity type for compatability with other sources, but just use path type
|
|
- path type on other types
|
|
- dependent path type PathP vs path over
|
|
- univalence
|
|
- the (non)-issue of J in (Cu)TT
|
|
- =isContr, isProp, isSet=
|
|
- drawing pictures + Structures, using univalence to transport
|
|
- transporting results between isomorphic structures
|
|
+ HITs, examples
|
|
- the constructed interval
|
|
- booleans and covers
|
|
- =S^n=
|
|
- =S^1= with 2 cw structures equiv + Homotopy n-types
|
|
- homotopy levels being closed under type constructions, in particular Set and ETT inside HoTT
|
|
+ in particular sigma types
|
|
|
|
** Debriefs
|
|
- 2021 July 15; Homotopy n-types + watched (Harper) lecture 15 on Sets being closed under type formations ->- motivates showing in Agda Sets closed under Sigma.
|
|
+ Harper does product case, claiming sigma case follows analogously, + attempt proof in Cubical Agda but highly non-obvious how to use that fibers are Sets.
|
|
+ difficulty is that PathP not in one fiber, but PathOver is, AND PathOver <-> PathP NON-obvious + Easy to generalize situation to n-types being closed under Sigma (7.1.8 in HoTT book), we showed this assuming PathPIsoPath
|
|
|
|
|
|
** SuperUltraMegaHyperLydianBosses
|
|
+ natural number object unique and `_+_` unique on any nat num obj + nat num obj unique
|
|
+ `_+_` unique on a model of nat num obj
|
|
- axiomatize addition on naturals
|
|
- naturals is a set
|
|
- fun extensionality
|
|
- contractability
|
|
- propositions
|
|
- propositions closed under sigma types + univalence
|
|
|
|
|
|
** Top 100 (set theoretic) misconceptions about type theory
|
|
+ Propositions
|
|
+ Proof relevance
|
|
+ Propositions are _inside the theory_
|
|
+ Membership not the same as :
|
|
+ typing is unique (doesn't make sense to intersect two types) +
|
|
+ Though set theory had fewer axioms type theory's assumptions are more intuitive (hence intionistic type theory)
|
|
There is no fiddling about with membership to construct things e.g. cartesian product
|
|
+ 'we cannot use LEM' ~ not assuming law of excluded middle _globally_ means type theory theorems are stronger!
|
|
+
|