plan change
This commit is contained in:
parent
c93ca368b2
commit
c22a5777d3
17
Plan.org
17
Plan.org
@ -79,9 +79,9 @@
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
** SuperUltraMegaHyperLydianBosses
|
** SuperUltraMegaHyperLydianBosses
|
||||||
- natural number object unique and _+_ unique on any nat num obj
|
+ natural number object unique and `_+_` unique on any nat num obj
|
||||||
+ nat num obj unique
|
+ nat num obj unique
|
||||||
+ _+_ unique on a model of nat num obj
|
+ `_+_` unique on a model of nat num obj
|
||||||
- axiomatize addition on naturals
|
- axiomatize addition on naturals
|
||||||
- naturals is a set
|
- naturals is a set
|
||||||
- fun extensionality
|
- fun extensionality
|
||||||
@ -89,3 +89,16 @@
|
|||||||
- propositions
|
- propositions
|
||||||
- propositions closed under sigma types
|
- propositions closed under sigma types
|
||||||
+ univalence
|
+ univalence
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
** Top 100 (set theoretic) misconceptions about type theory
|
||||||
|
+ Propositions
|
||||||
|
+ Proof relevance
|
||||||
|
+ Propositions are _inside the theory_
|
||||||
|
+ Membership not the same as :
|
||||||
|
+ typing is unique (doesn't make sense to intersect two types)
|
||||||
|
+
|
||||||
|
+ Though set theory had fewer axioms type theory's assumptions are more intuitive (hence intionistic type theory)
|
||||||
|
There is no fiddling about with membership to construct things e.g. cartesian product
|
||||||
|
+ 'we cannot use LEM' ~ not assuming law of excluded middle _globally_ means type theory theorems are stronger!
|
||||||
|
+
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user