diff --git a/Trinitarianism/AsTypes/Quest0.agda b/Trinitarianism/AsTypes/Quest0.agda
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..774efe7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Trinitarianism/AsTypes/Quest0.agda
@@ -0,0 +1,227 @@
+module Trinitarianism.AsTypes.Quest0 where
+
+open import Cubical.Core.Everything hiding (_∨_)
+-- ------------------------------
+
+{-
+  In this branch,
+  we develop the point of view of types as constructions / programs.
+
+  Here is our first construction.
+-}
+data Unit : Type where
+  trivial : Unit
+{-
+  This reads 'Unit is a type of construction and
+  there is a recipe for it, called "trivial"'.
+
+  Here is another construction.
+-}
+
+data Empty : Type where
+
+{-
+  This says that Empty is a construction and
+  there are no recipes for it.
+-}
+
+{-
+  Given two constructions A and B,
+  'converting recipes of A into recipes of B' is itself a type of construction,
+  written A → B.
+  To give a recipe of A → B,
+  we assume a recipe x of A and give a recipe y of B.
+
+  Here is an example demonstrating → in action
+-}
+
+UnitToUnit : Unit → Unit
+UnitToUnit = {!!}
+
+{-
+  * press C-c C-l (this means Ctrl-c Ctrl-l) to load the document,
+    and now you can fill the holes
+  * navigate to the hole { } using C-c C-f (forward) or C-c C-b (backward)
+  * press C-c C-r and agda will try to help you (r for refine)
+  * you should see λ x → { }
+  * navigate to the new hole
+  * C-c C-, to check what agda wants in the hole (C-c C-comma)
+  * the Goal area should look like
+
+  Goal: Unit
+  ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
+  x : Unit
+
+  * this means you have a proof of Unit 'x : Unit' and you need to give a proof of Unit
+  * you can now give it a proof of Unit and press C-c C-SPC to fill the hole
+
+  There is more than one proof (see solutions) - are they the same?
+-}
+
+{-
+  We can also encode "natural numbers" as a type of construction.
+-}
+data ℕ : Type where
+  zero : ℕ
+  suc : ℕ → ℕ
+{-
+  This reads '
+    - ℕ is a type of construction
+    - "zero" is a recipe for ℕ
+    - "suc" takes an existing recipe for ℕ and gives
+      another recipe for ℕ.
+  '
+-}
+{-
+  Let's write a program that
+  "given a recipe n of ℕ, tells us whether it is zero".
+
+  TODO finish this.
+-}
+isZero : ℕ → Type
+isZero zero = {!!}
+isZero (suc n) = {!!}
+
+{-
+Here's how:
+  * when x is zero, we give the proposition Unit
+  (try typing it in by writing \top then pressing C-c C-SPC)
+  * when x is suc n (i.e. 'n + 1', suc for successor) we give Empty (\bot)
+This is technically using induction - see AsTypes.
+
+In general a 'predicate on ℕ' is just a 'function' P : ℕ → Type
+-}
+
+{-
+You can check if zero is indeed zero by clicking C-c C-n,
+which brings up a thing on the bottom saying 'Expression',
+and you can type the following
+isZero zero
+isZero (suc zero)
+isZero (suc (suc zero))
+...
+-}
+
+{-
+We can prove that 'there exists a natural number that isZero'
+in set theory we might write
+  ∃ x ∈ ℕ, x = 0
+which in agda noation is
+  Σ ℕ isZero
+
+In general if we have predicate P : ℕ → Type we would write
+  Σ ℕ P
+for
+  ∃ x ∈ ℕ, P x
+
+To formulate the result Σ ℕ isZero we need to define
+a proof of it
+-}
+ExistsZero : Σ ℕ isZero
+ExistsZero = {!!}
+
+{-
+To fill the hole, we need to give a natural and a proof that it is zero.
+Agda will give the syntax you need:
+  * navigate to the correct hole then refine using C-c C-r
+  * there are now two holes - but which is which?
+  * navigate to the first holes and type C-c C-,
+    - for the first hole it will ask you to give it a natural 'Goal: ℕ'
+    - for the second hole it will ask you for a proof that
+    whatever you put in the first hole is zero 'Goal: isZero ?0' for example
+  * try to fill both holes, using C-c C-SPC as before
+  * for the second hole you can try also C-c C-r,
+    Agda knows there is an obvious proof!
+-}
+
+{-
+Let's show 'if all natural numbers are zero then we have a contradiction',
+where 'a contradiction' is a proof of Empty.
+In maths we would write
+  (∀ x ∈ ℕ, x = 0) → Empty
+and the agda notation for this is
+  ((x : ℕ) → isZero x) → Empty
+
+In general if we have a predicate P : ℕ → Type then we write
+  (x : ℕ) → P x
+to mean
+  ∀ x ∈ ℕ, P x
+-}
+
+AllZero→Empty : ((x : ℕ) → isZero x) → Empty
+AllZero→Empty = {!!}
+
+{-
+Here is how we prove it in maths
+  * assume hypothesis h, a proof of (x : ℕ) → isZero x
+  * apply the hypothesis h to 1, deducing isZero 1, i.e. we get a proof of isZero 1
+  * notice isZero 1 IS Empty
+
+Here is how you can prove it here
+  * navigate to the hole and check the goal
+  * to assume the hypothesis (x : ℕ) → isZero x,
+    type an h in front like so
+    AllZero→Empty h = { }
+  * now do
+    * C-c C-l to load the file
+    * navigate to the new hole and check the new goal
+  * type h in the hole, type C-c C-r
+  * this should give h { }
+  * navigate to the new hole and check the Goal
+  * Explanation
+    * (h x) is a proof of isZero x for each x
+    * it's now asking for a natural x such that isZero x is Empty
+  * Try filling the hole with 0 and 1 and see what Agda says
+-}
+
+{-
+Let's try to show the mathematical statement
+'any natural n is 0 or not'
+but we need a definition of 'or'
+-}
+data OR (P Q : Type) : Type where
+  left : P → OR P Q
+  right : Q → OR P Q
+{-
+This reads
+  * Given propositions P and Q we have another proposition P or Q
+  * There are two ways of proving P or Q
+    * given a proof of P, left sends this to a proof of P or Q
+    * given a proof of Q, right sends this to a proof of P or Q
+
+Agda supports nice notation using underscores.
+-}
+
+data _∨_ (P Q : Type) : Type where
+  left : P → P ∨ Q
+  right : Q → P ∨ Q
+
+{-
+[Important note]
+Agda is sensitive to spaces so these are bad
+
+data _ ∨ _ (P Q : Type) : Type where
+  left : P → P ∨ Q
+  right : Q → P ∨ Q
+
+data _∨_ (P Q : Type) : Type where
+  left : P → P∨Q
+  right : Q → P∨Q
+
+it is also sensitive to indentation so these are also bad
+
+data _∨_ (P Q : Type) : Type where
+left : P → P ∨ Q
+right : Q → P ∨ Q
+
+-}
+
+{-
+Now we can prove it!
+This technically uses induction - see AsTypes.
+Fill the missing part of the theorem statement.
+You need to first uncomment this by getting rid of the -- in front (C-x C-;)
+-}
+-- DecidableIsZero : (n : ℕ) → {!!}
+-- DecidableIsZero zero = {!!}
+-- DecidableIsZero (suc n) = {!!}
diff --git a/_build/2.6.3/agda/Trinitarianism/AsProps/Quest0Preamble.agdai b/_build/2.6.3/agda/Trinitarianism/AsProps/Quest0Preamble.agdai
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6bcced3
Binary files /dev/null and b/_build/2.6.3/agda/Trinitarianism/AsProps/Quest0Preamble.agdai differ
diff --git a/_build/2.6.3/agda/Trinitarianism/AsTypes/Quest0.agdai b/_build/2.6.3/agda/Trinitarianism/AsTypes/Quest0.agdai
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e8b5614
Binary files /dev/null and b/_build/2.6.3/agda/Trinitarianism/AsTypes/Quest0.agdai differ